Even if we had a vaccine, we wouldn’t be able to save America…

An article titled “preparing for a vaccine information war” in the New York times on Tuesday pointed to a nonsensical but real problem: even if a novel coronavirus vaccine is developed, what if more than half of americans refuse to be vaccinated?

A screenshot of the New York times article

In the face of the surging epidemic, the phrase “having a vaccine but refusing to get it” is really hard for most Chinese people to understand.However, us media writers cite evidence that their fears are not imaginary.

Since the outbreak of the epidemic in Europe and the us, we have seen many local people burning down the so-called “virus-spreading” 5G signal towers because of rumors.Others mistakenly believe that they want to get a disinfectant injection.In addition to these sporadic individual behavior, the public opinion field also exists such some organized rumors.

Around May 9, a conspiracy theory video called “the great plan of the plague” went viral, in which a group of self-described “experts” narrators said the epidemic was a plot concocted by the American billionaire Bill Gates and the scientist fauci to take over the world.

Cover of the great plague plan

Contrary to popular speculation that conspiracy theorists are stupid, the video is quite professional in its narration, shooting and score, which is obviously not for ordinary people.

It is also because of “excellent production” that the video went viral among netizens in Europe and the United States as soon as it was posted.So much so that the major social platforms will go out of their way to delete posts, but will still be video supporters do everything possible to exploit the loophole to re-issued.

“They [conspiracy theorists] are much more organized and strategic than many critics think,” the author of the New York times article was banned on video.They are savvy media manipulators, effective communicators, and adept at exploiting the weaknesses of social media platforms.”

In addition to the “efficiency” the author mentions, I also find that the conspiracy theories that have spread widely in this outbreak tend to have strong political leanings.For example, in the cartoon below, “leading the public opinion to accuse trump” is called the fourth step of Bill Gates “running the world”.

In many comments, the fear of being “manipulated by a conspiratorial force” is one reason why many netizens have rallied behind Mr Trump, dismissing criticism of some of his missteps as “aspirant conspiracies”.

One social media post, for example, said: “Bill Gates will put a tracker in the vaccine to monitor everyone, and we trump supporters will not be fooled.”

What is more worrying is that even before this outbreak, “anti-vaccine” rhetoric had developed into “conventional wisdom” in western societies, especially in the United States.

A long-running anti-vaccine cartoon depicts vaccines as manipulated venomous snakes

According to a study published in the prestigious academic journal nature, there were about three times as many anti-vaccine groups on social media during the 2019 measles outbreak as there were pro-vaccine groups.In addition, the interest of the anti-vaccine community is rising much faster than that of the scientific community.

A study of the anti-vaccine network on the website of the journal nature

And a study released this month found that trump supporters were more likely than other americans to agree with the idea of “anti-vaccination.”

An article on the academic journal website Elsevier

Trump’s previous tweet thumb up on “anti-vaccine” made anti-vaccine supporters feel like “the President is on my side,” which made them more convinced of their misconceptions.

Trump has made anti-vaccine comments

As a result, many in the media, including the author of the New York times, fear a “battle” against conspiracy theories to push a vaccine to protect people from novel coronavirus infection after a huge human and financial effort has been spent to develop one.

The virus caused the Vatican to have little income, and the pope who is good at “theology” can no longer sustain it

The Vatican has long been something of a rich country, because it can easily pay for its daily operations on the basis of income from tourism, papal public events and so on, since most of its citizens are clerics and church-related service workers.But covid-19 has cut off the Vatican’s main source of income, and the Pope’s family, which specializes in “theology”, is running out of money.

The Pope has been so worried recently that his main source of income, “Peter’s penny”, also known as the “holy see endowment”, is voluntary money given by catholics to the church in Rome. But this year’s service has been postponed until October, so the money has not yet come in.

There is also a larger income from tourism, especially the Vatican museums and various souvenirs, which is a large wallet for the Pope. However, Rome, which has not yet resumed tourism, makes the Vatican’s tourism income completely zero, leaving the Pope’s wallet empty.According to insiders, the church is now dipping into its reserves.

There is no hope of raising revenue, and the Vatican’s governing body is also discussing ways to reduce it, mainly by reducing the salaries of clergy, who will see their salaries cut by 25-45 percent, while it remains unclear when those salaries will be restored.But according to the church, the clergy’s job is an iron one, so their income is reduced, but they can keep their jobs.But it’s very stressful for the church.

Even at the current forecast, the Vatican may open again in autumn, but Treasury official said the Vatican is not optimistic, because in the absence of effective vaccines, after opening more strict security measures, the requirement of social distance, the new health laws and regulations as well as the expectations and the reduce of international tourists in the next few years affected the sale of tickets and souvenirs.The Vatican may not be able to return to its former income levels.That means the Pope has no choice but to save money and donate to the faithful.

How did a novel coronavirus get into the White House?

US President Donald trump said at the White House on May 11 that all personnel traveling to and from the west wing of the White House are required to wear face masks.The White House has changed testing from weekly to daily because of novel coronavirus infections confirmed by officials and secret service agents.

Judging from the recent actions of the White House, the outbreak inside China has forced people to strengthen the prevention and control.So how did a novel coronavirus get into the White House?

“Dare” to “face” the epidemic: don’t wear a mask anyway

In fact, the United States, like many western countries, believed that masks should be worn only after symptoms appear.It was not until early April, when more than 300,000 cases of novel coronavirus were confirmed in the United States, that the centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) announced a new protocol that advises people to wear masks in public.However, the CDC’s less timely “recommendation” was downgraded by President trump to “voluntary” at an April 3 briefing by the White House task force on the epidemic.

In response to questions from at least two reporters at the news conference, Mr. Trump repeatedly said he would not wear a mask.The reason: “I can’t imagine sitting behind a desk and wearing a mask to greet all kinds of national leaders.”

How did a novel coronavirus get into the White House?

The White House leadership is playing it safe

In fact, events at the White House have continued as usual since the centers for disease control and prevention issued its mask recommendations on April 3.From the President to the vice President, no one wore a mask, whether it was to meet with medical workers, hold meetings with generals or attend memorial ceremonies.

Donald trump has been criticized in the us media for not wearing a face mask in front of a group of veterans in their 90s on the anniversary of victory day.But Mr Trump said he was far from them and that “the wind is not blowing in [the veterans’] direction”.”You care about veterans, why don’t you care about me?” he joked to reporters.

When vice President mike pence visited a Minnesota hospital in late April, he did not wear a mask, even though it was specifically mentioned in hospital policy.”I don’t have a novel coronavirus with me,” he explained in order to communicate better. “I thought it was a rare opportunity to be here, and I wanted to talk to these researchers and these wonderful health workers, look them in the eye and say thank you.”

How did a novel coronavirus get into the White House?

Critics don’t buy the explanation: the mask doesn’t cover the eyes, and wearing it doesn’t prevent pence from looking the staff in the eye and saying thank you. It’s just an excuse for the White House leadership not to wear it.

Loose the economy?The White House is caught in a dilemma about restarting the economy

By early may, the administration had shelved economic rebooting guidelines prepared by the U.S. centers for disease control and prevention for a White House working group on the epidemic.

The 17-page guidelines specify how a range of places, including schools and public transport, should be reopened and protected.A number of American public health experts have said that this approach is “not only helpful, it is essential.”

But on May 8th, when Mr Trump was asked why he had not issued the guidelines, he threw the dice again: “I’m counting on the governors to reboot. They’re the ones who make the decisions.”

According to us media analysis, the White House has been trying to give the impression that the covid-19 outbreak is under control as it has been talking about restarting the economy since the end of march.On the surface, the White House had done little to prevent the disease, including wearing masks and keeping a safe distance.As a matter of policy, it is necessary to avoid issuing the latest economic restart guidelines from the us centers for disease control and prevention, because it may be difficult for any region to truly meet the standards of economic restart if the guidelines are followed.

Deliberately weakening the epidemic prevention and control undoubtedly gave the virus a chance to enter the White House;Ignoring the new guidelines and pushing for an economic reboot also poses a dilemma for the White House

How do you keep telling people that you can restart the economy now when you have covid-19 in the White House?

How do you tell people that the epidemic in the United States is under control when the White House suddenly starts requiring masks?

How did a novel coronavirus get into the White House?

A survey by the pew research center between April 29 and May 5 found that 68 percent of americans are still anxious about the economy restarting too soon.Novel coronavirus slipped into the White House when the us government was too lax in its anti-epidemic work to play down the outbreak.

Anthony fauci, director of the national institute of allergy and infectious diseases and a key member of the White House coronavirus response task force, said at a senate hearing Tuesday that the United States has not fully contained the outbreak.As a result, the dow Jones industrial average fell by more than 450 points on the same day, reflecting the widespread concern among americans about the epidemic.

But now that the White House has finally decided to start wearing masks, it’s a wake-up call to the fact that the epidemic has been so loose for so long.

International renowned virologist self-report “in the recruit” covid to the whole process of recovery: more awe of the virus

Peter Piot, a virologist at the director of the London school of hygiene and tropical medicine, was diagnosed with covid-19 in mid-march.He spent a week in hospital and has since been recovering at home in London.Even now, climbing the stairs still leaves him breathless.

What stands out from the rest is that Piot, who grew up in Belgium, was actually one of the discoverers of the ebola virus in 1976, and has spent his career fighting infectious diseases.

He was director of the United Nations joint programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) from 1995 to 2008 and is currently a consultant to Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European commission, on novel coronavirus.But his recent experience with novel coronavirus changed many of his ideas.

On May 2nd, after a break, the media interviewed prof piot remotely.In the interview, he explained the ups and downs and subtle psychological changes in his personal experience and his reflection on the perception of the covid and death.In his inner monologue, published in the top academic journal science, he says he is now more awed by viruses:

10 years without getting sick: ‘I’ll never forget that feeling’

On March 19, professor piot had a sudden fever and a stinging headache.He didn’t have a cough, but his first reaction was that he might have covid-19.Although a workaholic, professor piot worked from home.

But he still doubts that his test could be positive.After that he isolated himself in the guest room of his home.But the fever did not go away.

In the past 10 years, professor piot has never been ill or taken a day off sick.He lives a very healthy life and walks a lot.The only risk factor was age — he was 71.Because he is an optimist, he thinks it will pass.But on April 1st a doctor friend advised him to have a thorough check-up because he had developed a fever and was increasingly stressed.

At that point, professor piot was still suffering from severe hypoxia, although he did not experience shortness of breath.Lung images showed severe pneumonia, typical of covid-19, as well as bacterial pneumonia.He gradually became exhausted and energetic.He realized it wasn’t just fatigue, it was exhaustion.“I’ll never forget that feeling.I had to be hospitalized, although during that time my novel coronavirus test was negative.”He said.This is also typical for covid-19: the virus disappears, but the consequences persist for weeks.

Admitted to hospital for treatment: “resigned to fate” through hell

When he was first admitted to the hospital, he feared he would be immediately put on a ventilator because of reports that mechanical ventilation may increase mortality.Luckily, they just gave them an oxygen mask, and it worked.So he went to the isolation room in the front of the intensive care unit.When you’re tired, you’re forced to surrender to fate — and professor piot completely surrendered to the paramedics.The next step is to live in the normal process of going from syringe to infusion, hoping you can get through it.Professor piot says he is usually very progressive about the diagnosis and treatment of surgery, but at this point he was “100 per cent a patient”.

Professor piot was given a room to share with a homeless man, a Colombian cleaner and a man from Bangladesh.All three patients had diabetes, which was consistent with the fact that covid-19 patients usually have some chronic underlying disease.The day and night were especially silent, for no one was strong enough to speak.He could only whisper for a few weeks, he recalls.Even in the interview, his voice seemed weak at night.At the same time, the question always comes to his mind: what happens when you get out of trouble?

After more than 40 years of fighting viruses around the world, professor piot has become an expert on infections.He said he was glad he was infected with covid-19 and not ebola.Although before that he had read a scientific study that concluded that if you end up in a UK hospital with covid-19, you have a 30% chance of dying.That’s the same as the overall death rate from ebola in west Africa in 2014.“It makes you sometimes lose your scientific mind and yield to emotional reflection.Sometimes I think they’ve got me at last — I’ve spent my life fighting viruses, and in the end, they’ve got their revenge.”“I’ve been in heaven and earth for a week, and this could be the end of the world.”

After a long week, he was finally discharged from the hospital.On his way home on public transport, he wanted to see the city he lived in, only to be greeted by empty streets, closed bars and, thankfully, fresh air.The streets were empty. It was a strange experience.He could not walk normally because his muscles were weak from lying down and lack of movement, which is not a good thing when it comes to treating lung disease.At home, he cried for a long time.He slept for a while, too.But there was still a risk of serious error at some point — the thought stuck in his mind.Then you’ll have to be in the hospital again, dealing with what you’ve been through.

“I have always been in awe of viruses, and that awe has never diminished,” he said.I’ve spent most of my life fighting HIV.”But after experiencing the virus’s remarkable presence in his own body, autor’s view of the virus was different, and more awe-inspiring.Although he had been exposed to the virus before, he clearly felt its impact on his life — he felt more vulnerable.

Relapse after discharge: “cytokine storm” attacked multiple organs

Unfortunately, a week after leaving the hospital, professor piot’s breathing became increasingly difficult.He had to go back to the hospital for a second checkup, but this time, fortunately, he could be treated on an outpatient basis.It turned out that professor piot was suffering from an organized pneumonic lung disease set off by so-called cytokine storm — the result of an overactive immune defense system.

Many people die not from tissue damage caused by the virus, but from an overreaction by their immune systems that leaves cells unsure how to deal with the virus.

He is still being treated because high doses of corticosteroids can blunt the immune system.He will not be able to survive the aforementioned storm if it is accompanied by symptoms of a viral outbreak.Thankfully, it didn’t happen.

In severe cases, he even developed atrial fibrillation, with a heart rate of up to 170 beats per minute.Treatment is also needed to control, in particular to prevent blood clotting events, including strokes.

Here, professor piot sees an underrated ability of the virus: it can affect every organ in the body.

Many believe that covid-19 kills 1% of patients, while the rest get rid of flu-like symptoms.But professor piot warned that things could get more complicated, as many people face chronic kidney and heart problems.Even their nervous systems are damaged.Hundreds of thousands of people around the world, and possibly many more, will need treatments such as kidney dialysis for the rest of their lives.

He pointed out that the more you learn about novel coronavirus, the more questions will arise, and the important thing is to learn as you go along.Prof piot says he is annoyed at the “commentators” who stand on the sidelines and judge scientists and policymakers with little insight, trying to take the fate of the pandemic into their own hands.

Reflection after recovery: vaccines are the only strategy for getting out

After that, professor piot’s lung image finally looked better again.On the day of the interview on May 2nd, for the first time in seven weeks, professor piot felt more or less himself.

He wants to resume work, though his activities will be limited.One of the first things he did was to work as von der leyen’s covid special adviser on research and development.

He reminded the scientific community to be clear: without the novel coronavirus vaccine, humans would never be able to live normally.The only strategy that will truly emerge from this crisis is a vaccine that can be rolled out globally.That means producing billions of doses, which in itself is a huge challenge in terms of manufacturing quantities.Despite the efforts of scientists around the world, it is still uncertain whether a vaccine for the novel coronavirus can be developed.

He also points to a hidden risk: people who die from vaccines who no longer want their children vaccinated.So if you want to introduce a vaccine against the coronavirus, you might have a problem — if too many people refuse to do so, the world may never be able to contain the pandemic.